Heart
failure is the end result of most heart diseases, especially ischemic
coronary disease. This is a highly prevalent chronic condition among
older people (6-10% in those over 65 years), which provides a great
disease burden to the healthcare system.
Both
for its origin, which is none other than the long-term failure of
acute cardiac pathology, as well as for its diagnosis, the
cardiologists, and not the family physicians are the ones leading the
management of some clinical processes that are almost always torpid and
uncertain and which require a lot of action in the community and a
lot of coordination between the hospital and primary care; as you can
see, it’s not an easy business.
Heart
failure, unlike diabetes, is a chronic process that, as I have
already mentioned, slips away from the hands of the family doctor. To
begin with at the time of diagnosing, because the clinical diagnosis
is only presumptive and sending the patient to the hospital for an
echocardiogram confirmation is required. It now appears, however, that
it has been shown that the "NT-proBNP*" test (Verdú
2012), detectable in both blood and urine testing is sufficiently
cost-effective to be able to expect that primary care units could
begin to autonomously solve the diagnosis.
____________
(*NT-proBNP. Natriuretic peptides are hormones with diuretic and
vasodilator effects, segregated mainly in the left ventricle as a
compensatory mechanism for a pressure overload).