Showing posts with label Admissions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Admissions. Show all posts

Monday, 24 March 2014

Frail elderly patients: the case of Torbay








The health and social care for elderly people in Torbay (England) is fully integrated today (see the King's Fund document). In 2004 a pilot in one of the county’s districts was launched and soon spread to the entire area. Each of the 5 teams that were set up serves a population in a range from 25,000 to 40,000 inhabitants. In 2005 Torbay Care Trust was created.


The main objective of the service integration:
Maintaining the frail patients at home or in a community setting for as long as possible.

Key elements to achieve the objectives:
  • Integration of health and social care professional teams
  • Team budgets’ fusion
  • Deployment (or purchase if appropriate) of a wide range of intermediate services that facilitates home support
  • The enthusiastic support of family doctors (even though they have not been integrated)
  • Institutional support, especially local support

Monday, 24 February 2014

"The Poverty Hypothesis" versus "The Capacity Hypothesis"








The socioeconomic status influences the consumption of goods and services in each community in a very obvious way, a phenomenon which logically includes hospitalisation rates. But in what sense does poverty or wealth determine hospital utilisation? And what role does the accessibility to the number of installed beds in the community play in hospitalisation rates?

To try to answer these two questions I will examine two projects, an English one and an American one that emphasise two different hypothesis, the first one being based on the influence of poverty and the second one, on the installed capacity.

The English analysis. Hypothesis: poverty is crucial

This paper uses as a clinical measure, a closed list of 19 "Ambulatory Care-Sensitive Conditions (ACSC )", such as heart failure or diabetes complications that should not be a reason for admission if primary care had the capacity to globally treat these patients. Regarding the assessment of poverty, the study uses a socioeconomic quintiles index measuring various deprivations (Index of Multiple Deprivations: IMD 2010).