Measuring results in health is still very complicated

In order to evaluate health institutions based on the value they provide, health outcomes must be measured. However the efforts to achieve this are bearing dismal results. Pay-for-performance initiatives are drifting in an ocean of indicators that don’t translate into anything too operational. To give some examples, in the US, CMS (Medicare and Medicaid) handles nearly a thousand indicators to promote new funding models (see Health Affairs Blog "The Quality Tower of Babel") and, not so far away, in the Results Central of Catalonia (AQuAS), more than 300 indicators are recorded. Everything suggests that the excess of information will not bring light if we are not able to clarify what it means to add value to people's health, and to make this statement comprehensible, we must distinguish between two different approaches:

Health value for citizens

A long life free of disability is a goal that most mortals share but this indicator is not very useful for service providers because the impact of the health system on life expectancy barely reaches 20%.

Clinical safety: "The Leapfrog Group" and other benchmarkings

The Hospital Safety Score is a scaled assessment (A / B / C / D / E / F) of American hospitals that aims to provide that insurers and citizens have access to proven clinical safety information offered by each hospital in the system. The Hospital Safety Score is a summary of 26 parameters that feed on both a voluntary survey and official sources: AHRQ (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality), CDC (Centre for Disease Control and Prevention), CMS (Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services) and "American Hospital Association Annual Survey."

Hospital Benchmarking: Top 20 Iasist and "US News Best Hospitals"

Benchmarking is a healthy exercise but to do it in the healthcare field it’s necessary to have solid databases, to know how to select consistent indicators and how to adjust and refine the data to the maximum so that the results are really comparable. In this post I want to discuss the essence of two famous private competitions, one Spanish and one North American.

Iasist, a company specializing in health information management has announced the 15th edition of the Top 20, a competition amongst Spanish hospitals which is voluntary, free and anonymous where only the results of the nominees and the winners are published. The purpose of this competition is in the winners’ institutional prestige.